|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trak Cranker
Feral Tendency Ratel Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.19 17:09:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Khavi Vetali I love sweeping generalizations!! Just love 'em. This means that everyone in Feral Tendancy and Ratel Alliance are stupid enough to leave cap ships un-piloted at a POS. Wow!!
Given the reponses, its hardly a sweeping generalisation.
Regardless of what we lost and how, the rest of the community deserves to be warned.
Thats all.
|
Trak Cranker
Feral Tendency Ratel Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.19 17:15:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Bolom He is just too good for them, but when someone says want some free ships, its not like you care where they come from.
See, thats where we might differ. Thief thinks every man steals.
|
Trak Cranker
Feral Tendency Ratel Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.19 18:52:00 -
[3]
Well, at least there is nothing here to disprove the sanity of the warning. Which was all it was.
We could sit back and let it happen to someone else or we could warn other people about it.
Mock us to your hearts content.
|
Trak Cranker
Feral Tendency Ratel Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.20 02:44:00 -
[4]
Originally by: MIGHTYDWC
I can't remember which member of BOB said this, but, didn't you read the back of the box before you paid your first months sub fee? It's a game, things like this are allowed, some things aren't, read the EULA for those. Deal with it, learn from it, move on.
I don't think we said anywhere that we thought the actions were not allowed? Or that we feel they cheated in the exploiting sense of the word, somehow? Or that they should not be allowed their own choice of gameplay?
But as well as its an option in the game to perform and contribute to corp theft, its also an option, and in our eyes, an obligation, to warn the rest of the players against characters performing same as we consider it vile and detestable. (All in game, based on ingame actions. I think I understand Molle better than you do, honestly.)
I do not want to deny the players the option of doing so (would I like some better built in obstructions? Perhaps..), but I will try and obstruct it if possible.
We have dealt with it and moved on and whatever other pocket philosophies you want to throw at it. This thread was not for us. If so we definately had kept our mouths shut.
And as far as doing PR for these guys goes, I could care less if there is the odd chance it can prevent someone else from being victim to the same.
Because thats how _we_ want to play the game.
|
|
|
|